Permalink

0

Open-Access-Bücher zur Sprachwissenschaft

In der let­zten Zeit sind u.a. diese frei ver­füg­baren Titel erschienen:

Free variation in grammar: Empirical and theoretical approaches

Kristin Kopf & Thi­lo Weber (Hrsg.)
https://benjamins.com/catalog/slcs.234

Recent years have seen a grow­ing inter­est in gram­mat­i­cal vari­a­tion, a core explanan­dum of gram­mat­i­cal the­o­ry. The present vol­ume explores ques­tions that are fun­da­men­tal to this line of research: First, the ques­tion of whether vari­a­tion can always and com­plete­ly be explained by intra- or extra-lin­guis­tic pre­dic­tors, or whether there is a cer­tain amount of unpre­dictable – or ‘free’ – gram­mat­i­cal vari­a­tion. Sec­ond, the ques­tion of what impli­ca­tions the (in-)existence of free vari­a­tion would hold for our the­o­ret­i­cal mod­els and the empir­i­cal study of gram­mar. The vol­ume pro­vides the first ded­i­cat­ed book-length treat­ment of this long-stand­ing top­ic. Fol­low­ing an intro­duc­to­ry chap­ter by the edi­tors, it con­tains ten case stud­ies on poten­tial­ly free vari­a­tion in mor­phol­o­gy and syn­tax drawn from Ger­man­ic, Romance, Ural­ic and Mayan.

Lexical anaphora: a corpus-based typological study of referential choice

Nils Nor­man Schi­borr
https://doi.org/10.20378/irb-59773

When­ev­er speak­ers refer to enti­ties or events, they are tasked with mak­ing a series of deci­sions: which enti­ty to refer to, how to embed it into syn­tac­tic struc­tures, and which type of expres­sion to use for the ref­er­ence. This study con­cerns itself with the last of these deci­sions, the selec­tion of the lin­guis­tic expo­nents of ref­er­ence, or ref­er­en­tial choice. While it is well known that lan­guages dif­fer great­ly in their pref­er­ence for either pronom­i­nal (she, this) or zero anapho­ra (ellip­sis) to refer back to pre­vi­ous­ly men­tioned dis­course ref­er­ents, the over­all rates of occur­rence of lex­i­cal­ly-head­ed anapho­ra (the woman, Jane) in mono­log­i­cal dis­course turn out to be remark­ably sta­ble across lan­guages.

This study exam­ines the cir­cum­stances in which speak­ers opt for the more infor­ma­tive but less econom­i­nal choice of lex­i­cal ref­er­ences over reduced alter­na­tives. It does so from a typo­log­i­cal and com­par­a­tive angle, chart­ing the cross-lin­guis­tic sta­bil­i­ty of cer­tain class­es of explana­to­ry fac­tors and the para­metri­ciza­tion of oth­ers across lan­guages. Rather than adopt­ing a spe­cif­ic the­o­ret­i­cal frame­work in its approach to the ques­tion, it instead explores a num­ber of empir­i­cal bot­tom-up approach­es, deriv­ing com­plex ana­lyt­i­cal cat­e­gories from mul­ti­ple lev­els of rel­a­tive­ly basic anno­ta­tions. Where ear­li­er research on ref­er­en­tial choice has been focused pre­dom­i­nant­ly based on writ­ten data, or else on small data sets of spo­ken lan­guage from Eng­lish and oth­er over­rep­re­sent­ed lan­guages, this study address­es issues of typo­log­i­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tiv­i­ty by employ­ing spo­ken cor­po­ra from a diverse set of ten lan­guages, many of which are under­stud­ied and endan­gered.

Reflexive constructions in the world’s languages

https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/284
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7861660

This land­mark pub­li­ca­tion brings togeth­er 28 papers on reflex­ive con­struc­tions in lan­guages from all con­ti­nents, rep­re­sent­ing very diverse lan­guage types. While reflex­ive con­struc­tions have been dis­cussed in the past from a vari­ety of angles, this is the first edit­ed vol­ume of its kind. All the chap­ters are based on orig­i­nal data, and they are broad­ly com­pa­ra­ble through a com­mon ter­mi­no­log­i­cal frame­work. The vol­ume opens with two intro­duc­to­ry chap­ters by the edi­tors that set the stage and lay out the main com­par­a­tive con­cepts, and it con­cludes with a chap­ter pre­sent­ing gen­er­al­iza­tions on the basis of the stud­ies of indi­vid­ual lan­guages.

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Pflichtfelder sind mit * markiert.